Longwood University Logo
Greenwood Library, Celebrate Curiosity logo with link to homepage

Generative AI: Evaluating AI Results

Evaluating AI Results

We can evaluate AI-generated content in much the same ways as we evaluate other sources. Tests such as the CCOW method of source evaluation can be helpful in determining whether the generated information you've found is reliable.

However, some of the questions we typically ask about sources may be more difficult to answer when working with generative AI, because AI tools do not disclose the processes used or the information consulted to arrive at the answers it provides.

Tests such as the SIFT method of source evaluation (or the Four Moves) can be helpful in determining whether the generated information you've found is reliable. 

Stop to think critically

Before sharing or using information, stop to check your emotional response to the information. Also be sure to consider:

  • What do you already know about the topic?
  • What do you know about the source? What is it's reputation?
  • Could your search strategy be affecting the results you receive?

Investigate the source

According to digital literacy expert and creator of the SIFT method, Mike Caulfield, "you want to know what you’re reading before you read it" to make the most of your time when engaging in the research process. Knowing about the source can help you better understand the trustworthiness of the information. Take a moment to consider:

  • Who is the author or creator? What do you know about them/the organization?
  • What is the mission of the creator? Do they have specific motives for sharing information? 
  • Does the author have authority in the area?

You can use lateral reading to investigate what other trusted sources say about the source you're interested in. Google and Wikipedia can be helpful for this step!

Find better coverage

Lateral reading can be helpful for this step, too. Look for other sources that 

  • Can you find other coverage of information on the topic?
  • Is there coverage that is more trusted, more in-depth, or maybe just more varied?

Trace claims, quotes, and media to their original context

It is good practice to try to locate the original source and context of quotes and information because much of what exists on the internet has been intentionally stripped of context. 

  • Has the claim, quote, or media been fairly represented?
  • Has information been cherry-picked to support an agenda?
  • Has information been taken out of context?

Check out the video below for a more in-dept explanation of evaluating AI-generated content: